Humor is really quite strange. While there may be many
theories on what makes something funny, there really can never be a solid
definition of what makes something funny and what is acceptable to joke about
because both of these are unique to every individual. What I believe makes
something funny comes down to the unexpected happening, and what is acceptable
comes down to context, who is saying it, and who he is saying it to.
First, what
makes something funny at all? In the question originally posed, it is stated
that “Humor usually violates personal norms that tie into cultural norms. For instance, fart jokes.” I think there is a
lot of credence, but I don’t think that this is the very thing that makes
something funny. For instance, consider puns. These are not funny because they
go against cultural norms. These are funny (to some people) because they use
words or phrases in unexpected ways. Further, consider Trevor Noah’s end to the
“black Hitler” bit. This was funny because he previously mentioned wanting to
be black, so when the German yelled “black Hitler!”, Trevor ended the bit by
saying “at least she said I was black.” That’s hilarious. I would call this
clever humor. You didn’t expect that to be what he said after this encounter. I
think that if you were to boil humor down to its essence, I think it is just
when something happens or is said that you didn’t expect. This explains why
personal or cultural norms being violated is funny – you don’t expect it. It
also explains why seeing someone fall down or stub their toe is funny – you
expected them to walk with no issue, but issues arose regardless. Humor is a
response to surprise similar to shock.
Secondly,
what makes something okay to joke about? I think this comes down to three
things: context, who is saying it, and who it is being said to. Consider
Gabriel Iglesias’ bit about the “racist gift basic.” The context was a comedy
show, so this is pretty harmless. Imagine, however, if he was speaking at the
funeral of a black individual killed by white supremacists. The same thing said
by the same person is no longer funny. With the same skit as an example,
consider if Gabriel was a white man. I think that the audience would have
thought it to be less okay. Because Gabriel is a minority himself, even though
he’s not black, it is likely to go over better. This comes down to the history of cultures. There is a history of white people being
oppressive towards black people, so further oppression is not going to be
funny. The Hispanic and black community do not have the same scarred history.
Finally, who you are saying the joke to is going to influence what is okay to
joke about and what is funny. If you tell a joke that is about how stupid Trump
is, it would probably go over well with the audience at the Democratic National
Convention. However, it would likely offend many and be unfunny to the audience
at the Republican National Convention. Your audience matters as well.
There are a
lot of variables into what makes something funny and what makes something okay
to joke about. These variations create a broad spectrum of comedy. You have
comedians using all types of comedy (clever tie-ins, clever social commentary,
puns, or “fart jokes”) appealing to all types of audiences. John Mullaney’s dry,
story-telling comedy is vastly different than Daniel Tosh’s extremely crude,
offensive comedy. Both are professional comedians, but an audience member of
one comedian’s crowd is probably unlikely to think the other comedian is very
funny at all. There will never be a formula for what is funny, there will never
be a strict definition. And in a world where most things have definitions and
in a world governed by the formulas of physics, this is unexpected. Isn’t that
funny?
No comments:
Post a Comment