While deliberating which movie to analyze, I figured the best way
to provide a critical analysis was to re-watch a movie that I am familiar with
and use the theories and analysis skills that we've discussed in class to try
to unveil tactics of the producer to portray fear. The movie I watched, one of
my all time favorites, The Silence of the
Lambs, based on the novel written by Thomas Harris. I realized that the
motivations of the semi-protagonist (Hannibal "The
cannibal" Lector), and the main protagonist (Clarice Starling) could
be derived from the Lacan psychoanalysis theory of desire. This blog post
speculates on Lacan’s theory of desire as the motivation factor for each of
these characters.
As a brief overview of The
silence of the lambs, Starling was raised in a single father household with
no siblings. Once her father gets murdered in the line of duty (Police), Starling
goes on to essentially raise herself and join the FBI later in life, following
in his footsteps. She gets contracted by the FBI late in the academy to stop an
elusive serial killer, Buffalo Bill, from striking again. However, Sterling
cannot crack the case without the help of Hannibal Lector, a forensic
psychiatrist and cannibalistic serial killer.
Lacan theorized that individual desire is rooted in the
desires of others. This idea is a crucial when analyzing Starling. After
Starling’s father gets murdered, she goes to live with her aunt and uncle on a
sheep farm. She couldn’t stand the fact that she had to live without her father
and attempted to escape with a screaming lamb that she tried to save. This memory haunts Starling to the point to
which the only way she believes she can stop the screaming is by catching
Buffalo Bill. I don’t think that the fact that Starling joined the FBI was any
coincidence. I believe Starling was motivated by her father in two ways; by his
passion to bring criminals to justice and intrinsic desire to avenge his death.
These two things she believes her father desired. During an interrogation, Lector says, “And
you think if you save poor Catherine, you could make them stop, don't you? You
think if Catherine lives, you won't wake up in the dark ever again to that
awful screaming of the lambs”. This
makes me believe that Starling is motivated by her father to catch Buffalo
Bill, and subsequently end the screaming of the lambs.
Motivation of Hannibal “The
Cannibal” Lector, is a little bit more cryptic and requires a deeper
understanding of how a common theme in the movie, “Quid pro quo”, and Lacan’s
recourse of game theory and motivation are related. Throughout almost the
entire duration of the film, Hannibal Lector is detained in one shape or
another. His motivations for freedom are all dependent on the success of
Starling catching Buffalo Bill. However, his help comes at a price. Many times
Lector states, “Quid pro quo, you tell me something, ill tell you something”.
He uses this strategy to slowly get more freedoms from the federal government
in exchange for more freedoms. Starling would promise him a transfer to a lower
security prison in exchange for a psychoanalysis… *wink wink* of Buffalo Bill
to expedite her investigation. Lacan’s recourse on game theory states, “game
theory involves precisely the attempt to formalize the possibilities available
to individuals in situations where their decisions concerning their wants can
in principle both affect and be affected by the decisions of others” (Sharpe).
Understanding Lacan’s recourse of game theory is pivotal in deciphering exactly
how he is impacting Starling. Lector makes sure that Sterling is always on the
right course because he knows if he leads her astray, he will get nothing in
return.
While watching this movie, I developed a new respect for the
finer details of the thriller genera. I think that in a lot of these “creepy”
movies, we lose sight of smaller important details that get covered up by the
graphic use of imagery and violence. To
my pleasure, I am happy to see how incorporating the theories of Lacan can shed
light on a whole new dynamic of film that otherwise could be missed.
Sharpe , Matthew. “Jacques Lacan (1901-1981 ) .” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/lacweb/#SH2a.
Opa! welcome to the amazing world of thrillers and horrors. They truly are wonderful in their own right. The 'scary' things are something that is a realization of the amazing passion and realism that they attempt to portray, and what a wonderful movie you have chosen to make this very deliberate step into the enjoyment of the films. The character of Hannibal Lector is a rather interesting one to look at because of the odd facets that are brought to the camera: his cannibalism (obviously), his obsession with Clairece (is it sexual or just a mater of taste), his inability to go a few short lines without saying something that puts his odities on display (perhaps he is hiding something else). I am so glad you have grown to at least respect these movies for their ability to bring us "dynamic of film" that can be enjoyed by many.
ReplyDelete"Just a matter of taste"--nice job
ReplyDelete