Monday, February 26, 2018

Group B, Post 2, Lolita: "light of my life, fire on my loins. My sin, my soul" by Kathleen Paxtor

Lolita is about a man, in his 40’s, named Humbert and 12 year old Delores (or Lo) and their intimate affair with each other. Just by the first sentence it is quite easy to judge that this book is immediately wrong and sick, and I too was once quick to judge but it is so much more than that, Lolita opens a pathway to question love, life, and fate.

Image result for lolita 1962



In the beginning of the book/movie a memoir is sent to John Ray titled “Lolita”, this came from Humbert who had recently died in prison. The memoir explains all of Humbert’s losses, experiences and regrets. He explains that ever since his childhood love died, Annabel, little girls infatuated him. One day he is looking for a place to stay when he stumbles upon the house of Charlotte (Lo’s mom) and Delores. He quickly is possessed by his need for being around Lo that he marries Charlotte just to be near Lo. One day Charlotte finds out the intention behind Humbert and storms off angry and gets run over by a car; just like that Humbert and Lo are finally together. Humbert takes Lo far away and they become very intimate (sexually and emotionally); their relationship develops as what you could say is a dominant and submissive. In this case Lo became the dominant because she realized the powers she had over Humbert, she knew that whenever she needed something Humbert would give in. After a while passes, Lo runaway with another older gentlemen named Quilty who insists she does child pornography but Lo refuses. Many years later after Humbert searched for Lo years and years he receives a letter from her saying she is pregnant and need money. Humbert drops everything and goes to find her. He sees Lo (now about 17) pregnant and now married, he begs her to come back with him but she says no. Humbert gives her all his money and goes to find Quilty and kills him. Humbert ends up in jail and dies there from heart failure, while Lo dies during childbirth; that is how the book ends, no happy ending, no recovery, no salvation, just death and harsh real life.


Like I had previously said if anyone else had read/hear the summary with no context it could be perceived as being just sick and in a way it is, but in another way it is beautiful (not the act of pedophilia) but the meaning behind the way Lo’s life developed. As a firm believer that everything happens for a reason, I never truly understood what that reason was for everything that happened to Lo. When I first read the book my mind was all over the place, I wanted to hate Humbert yet I his persuasive writing made me think of him as not a pedophile but as a regular love driven guy. In the film/book, Lo is perceived as being “unvirginal long before Humbert came upon the scene, so knowing, so jaded, so unchildlike” (Vickers). This is not to say that Humbert had every right to do what he did because he didn’t, but to him every little thing Lo did just made him weaker and relentless to have her. For a teenage child, Lo lived an unexpected life, from being orphaned, kidnapped, raped, and sexualized, to just end up dead sounds horrid but unfortunately that is every day life for some. I think the meaning behind Lolita is to show the normalness of two people living their lives (in a way that we may not agree with) just to end up the same like all us, dead. It was an emotional, confusing rollercoaster but and the end of the day you realize that “the desperate truth of Lolita’s story is not the rape of a twelve-year-old by a dirty old man, but the confiscation of one individual’s life by another. Although we cannot know what Lolita’s life might have been like had Humbert not hijacked it, “the novel, the finished work, is hopeful, beautiful even, a defense not just of beauty but of life, ordinary everyday life, all the normal pleasures that Lolita, was deprived of” (Vickers). And much like Lo felt conflicted with the way her life took a turn, I felt conflicted with her life and how it compared to mine.



*Side Note: If you watch ever watch the movie or (especially) read the book I thought it was interesting how Nabokov made Humbert so literate and beautifully spoken. His writing was poetic yet the acts he wrote about were not. 

References:
Vickers, Graham. Chasing Lolita : How Popular Culture Corrupted Nabokov's Little Girl All Over Again, Chicago Review Press, 2008. ProQuest Ebook Central,

5 comments:

  1. Even though I haven't watched the movie before, going through your post made me want to know more about the whole story and the reason why a 40-year-old man would want to have an affair with a girl who could be as young as his own daughter. Even though age doesn't matter when it comes to love, and Humbert was doing whatever he can with his power to prove his love to Lolita I think there should be some boundaries while dealing with under aged girls. Great Post!

    -Weini.W

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, you're right. Reading the first line of the post really can push your opinions about this novel quite astray. I do believe that you gave a great synopsis of the novel as it just isn't a pedophilic lovestruck late-middle aged man getting his grove on with a 12 year old girl. This story is captivating in nature and really can showcase how strong basic human emotions can actually be. However, I still don't think its ever okay for a 40 year old man to be getting all groovy with a 12 year old girl. Nice use of an outside source as well.
    - Kyle Gardner

    ReplyDelete
  3. The above 2 coments lead me to an interesting idea... why is it that the exact age of a person matters? I know/understand/believe in what the law has to say (look at me being defensive. I am truly ashamed). what is it about the difference in age that leads us to believe it being wrong?!? in the semi-distant past the idea of having "silent women" or concubines was not a strange idea, and I think while they had merit and were a good idea because of political reasons they do not work the same way. I really do struggle with this idea and am not sure where to go with it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This pushes the boundaries too much for me. It sounds like it's just romanticizing pedophilia. I don't think the "love" story between a 40 year old man and a 12 year old should be shown in a romantic light. We have consent laws for a reason, and at 12 years old I really don't think you understand the risks of sex and what it can mean. She was probably never taught about healthy sex- especially if she got pregnant at 17 and was with a 40 year old when she was 12. Maybe I should watch the movie before judging it so harshly but honestly it all sounds disturbing. Maybe it is about two people living their lives in a taboo way, but this is just a little over the line for me. I think it's wrong to romanticize these types of "relationships". I'm all for women embracing their sexuality, but not at 12 years old. This movie could lead to an important topic to talk about- consent and healthy sex- but it sounds like this movie spends more time romanticizing pedophilia.
    - Bailey West

    ReplyDelete
  5. For me this story flashes my memory back to the first time I read The Lovely Bones and although i've never had the misfortune of being on the receiving end of an older ma's perverted actions it was unsettling. Unsettling because I could read the story from the view of the victim. Although you read it as though he is just in love, I understood it as an twisted infatuation. 12 years old are in love with something new every week until they turn... until they start to grow up or mature a bit. Lolita was a baby. She really hadn't even matured yet.
    If I'm going to be completely honest though I kind of see why Jacob is stuck in what to think about what age has to do with things and the answer I can give to that is knowing right from wrong. As an adult, falling in love with a minor and manipulating or flat out forcing them to be with you is nothing short of despicable. No one gets too mad at two teens, 14-17 having sexual relationships, accidentaly making babies, because the both are growing, the both are making mistakes, they should know better but actually don't. When a grown adult knows better and goes on someone who doesn't know any better its taking advantage of them. That why we cringe when we see videos of men marrying children as young as 9 or a TV showman kissing girls on his T.V. show because he can ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6b1HfMWJhc ). There is no age limit on love because we can love anyone no matter what age. You love your grandma or baby cousin all the same because the love is "platonic" is the best word I have for that. There is a limit on sexual attraction, an imaginary line that isn't really all that imaginary since we all know when it has been crossed. No grown man should be sexually attracted to a child that hasn't even started puberty.

    -Dianesa Sanon
    (that was terribly long, sorry)

    ReplyDelete

Resubmissios Essay

Throughout this essay I will be discussing the skills that I need to work on with it being personal skills and skills that pert...