“An American
Crime” truly opened my mind into looking at the depths of how intentionally
cruel humans can truly be under dire, psychological circumstances and how the
loss of innocence can go beyond sexual tendencies. This movie is based on a
true story over the murder Sylvia Likens. Sylvia (and her sister Jenny) were
left in care with a lady named Gertrude. Both of Sylvia’s parents had to leave
for work and decided it was best for their daughters to stay somewhere stable,
but little did they know that they had made a deal with the devil. The deal
Gertrude was that Sylvia’s parents were going to pay Gertrude $20 a week to
take care of both Sylvia and Jenny Likens, instead of that they received
Sylvia’s cold, dead body.
After Sylvia’s
parents failed to pay one week, Gertrude goes from the ideal kind-hearted
hostess to Satan himself. Little by little Gertrude starts to abuse Sylvia
making her do the most perverse things. For example, Gertrude made Sylvia stick
a glass Coke bottle into her vaginal area. From there it only got worse,
Gertrude would strike Sylvia with every chance she would get and eventually
held her captive in the basement. Gertrude let the abuse get so far that she
would have teens come over and beat up Sylvia while Gertrude branded Sylvia
with the words “I’m a prostitute”. I thought the way Gertrude was portrayed was
really interesting. I believe that her circumstances drove her to an edge. The
movie portrays Gertrude as a low-income woman who is trying to raise a large
family by herself. She is seen washing people’s clothes to try and raise extra
money to provide for her large family and deadbeat boyfriend. Throughout the
movie there were many scenes where she mixed medicine and alcohol together. Her
boyfriend would also beat her. I think that all the problems Gertrude had she
projected onto Sylvia. There was a specific scene that really made me think about Gertrude's psychological and mental state. In the scene, Gertrude is on the floor cleaning and wiping down Sylvia after she had just received her beating, Sylvia was tied down and beaten by Gertrude herself yet seconds later Gertrude looked worried and acts nurturing. Scenes like this made me feel pity yet hatred towards
Gertrude, because it made me wonder what was really going on with her. The way the director filmed the movie made me wonder if Gertrude was
truly evil because of her circumstances or was she always evil at heart.
(the top picture is from the movie, bottom picture has the directors guiding the actors)
Sylvia lost her
innocence not only sexually but also in life. She had to undergo things that
should never be mentioned. She was stripped from her life at a young age and
was thrown into a life of murderous torture. The directors’ play with this idea
of cruelty and innocence throughout the whole movie and this can be seen
through the locations they chose to portray.
In the opening scenes, the movie starts off with locations that
stereotypically portray innocence. The first of the two locations was the carnival.
This is where we meet Jenny and Sylvia Likens. When you think of carnivals you
think of children, fun, food, and games. That is exactly how it is shown in the
movie, with happy music playing in the background and the sound of children
laughing; towards the end of the movie the perspective of this completely
changes (we will come back to this). The next scene is located in front of a
church. I found this interesting because this is where they meet Gertrude and
her children. The church is supposed to represent values, honesty, and purity,
which is the opposite of who Gertrude was or represented. In the end, Gertrude
went against everything that would be considered as acting “godly”.
Kathleen,
ReplyDeleteThis film is very interesting and you make some great points about cruelty and innocence portrayed. Based on the information about the film that you shared, I agree when you say that Gertrude was projecting her own torture onto Sylvie. But why would that be? I think it because Gertrude longed to exert her dominance and authority over someone instead of being the victim for a change. This was her opportunity and she took it. Her need to provide for her family would also be a trigger for her sudden change in character and her need to control some aspect of her life, finding none, she lashedo out on Sylvie.
-Aly Hernandez
This movie sounds really interesting. I think the scene you described of Gertrude beating Sylvia and then stopping to clean her up was particularly intriguing. I really want to know if there were more scenes like this throughout the movie? Was Gertrude only "redeemed" in this single scene or multiple times throughout. If she was shown correcting her mistakes or redeeming herself (in a way) throughout the movie, I think that would show an interesting side to her character. If this was the case, it would make me believe that Gertrude is having a great internal conflict. Something about torturing Sylvia is giving her something she needs but deep down she knows is wrong. If this was the only scene that Gertrude is seen in this way, I wonder why the writers and directors decided to include it. Was it to make the audience feel bad for Gertrude? Or maybe something else?
ReplyDelete- Jared Islas
This movie really sounds interesting and at the same time heart breaking. Your blog reminds me to some real time story that I have heard few years back. Even though Gertrude had some financial and family issues, the way she treated Sylvia was cruel and unforgivable. In my opinion I feel like the things she did to Sylvia might be initiated from things she experienced from her own childhood or she might have a real mental issue. I wish the film director made it clear why Gertrude did things she did instead of us questioning it.
ReplyDelete-Weini W.
It was sad and very hurtful, seeing a little girl tortured a lot. I don’t understand why Gertrude would abuse Sylvia. Probably is because she had a rough childhood or maybe she was abused before. But that didn’t give her any right to hit Sylvia. If only Gertrude would learn from her mistake, then probably Sylvia would find her heart to forgive her. Even though it’s not easy to forgive someone who hurts or abused you poorly, it’s still up to you whether if you choose to forgive or not to forgive.
ReplyDelete-Kendra ZeMenye
As someone going into child psych with the intention of helping in a therapeutic setting, it makes me sick that someone can do this to a child and justify it. I have never seen this movie and probably never will for that same reason, but I can say that it sounds like an interesting look into human psychology and the actions people take under stress. The loss of innocence is lost on me probably because I do not know the depths and duration of Sylvia's torturous time under Gertrude's 'care'. I feel that you made me understand the cruelty however, which was your intention.
ReplyDelete--Zach Helmstetter
Its interesting that the directer chose to put those two scenes right next to each other. I thought of it as a sombering of the audience. The carnival is supposed to be a lively emotion and then when followed with a church you are kind of reminded of the severity of the movie itself or in the this case, the severity of Gertrude's lack of faith and conscious decision to do things that were considered to be ungodly.
ReplyDelete-Dianesa Sanon
You did a really great job showing two really complex ideas within the concept of what it means to be evil. First, I was really intrigued by your description of how Gertrude would torture the girl, but then she would become almost motherly. It really begs the question whether people are completely evil even if they do evil things. I mentioned in a blog comment before that we like to label people as completely evil vs. completely good. It seems like there is an argument that even though Gertrude was undoubtedly doing completely evil deeds, she herself wasn't completely evil. The second thing that you brought up was that she was living a miserable life as well. This brings forward the question of whether people choose to be evil, or whether society and peers push people closer and closer to the edge of evil. This is an uncomfortable question, for if it is society and peers that push people to evil, two arguments can be made. First, as a society and as peers of people who are doing evil things, we are somewhat responsible for evil behavior. Second, if people are pushed towards being evil, what is stopping us, or the "non-evil" people in the world from being pushed towards villainy? These are complex questions, and I'm not sure that anybody really has the answer. Anyway, I'm droning on, but great post!
ReplyDelete-JJ Leath